30 January 2016

RM2.6 Billion: The Debate



www.kopihangtuah.blogspot.com





A friend who is a Malaysian who left the country long long time ago is trying to give his opinion on the state of affairs of Malaysian politics particularly on the RM2.6 billion debacle. He has sarcastically list down 30 replies (Jawapan) that portray the current administration negatively. I have taken a more balanced approach of replying in CAPS as below:

Jawapan 1 : (Diam)
BETTER SILENCE THAN GIVING TOO MUCH INFO. EVEN LIM GUAN ENG WOULD DO THAT

Jawapan 2 : Akaun itu tidak wujud.
MONIES RECEIVED FROM SAUDI FOR PURPOSE OF BATTLING TERRORISTS. IF I AM THE PM, I WOULD NOT REVEAL FOR THE SAKE OF THE NATION. SEE NOW HOW ISIS RELEASED VIDEO TO ATTACK MALAYSIA. 

Jawapan 3 : Ejaan nama Najib Razak oleh WSJ adalah silap.
OF COURSE LAWYERS WILL FINE EVERY SINGLE STUPID TECHNICAL ERRORS TO ESCAPE. WHO WOULD NOT? FOR THE SAME REASON.... THAT IS SECRECY WITH GOOD INTENTIONS TO PROTECT THE NATION.

Jawapan 4 : Saya tak guna duit itu untuk kegunaan peribadi.
WELL.... IF IT WAS TO FIGHT ISIS ETC... THEN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE

Jawapan 5 : Penulisan Wall Street Journal adalah berunsur fitnah.
OF COURSE FITNAH. THEY ATE TRYING TO PAINT A CORRUPTION STORY RATHER THAN A COURSE TO FIGHT TERRORISM.

Jawapan 6 : Saya akan saman WSJ pada hari Selasa.
OF COURSE. I WOULD DO THE SAME. DEFAMATION RIGHT?

Jawapan 7 : Yahudi sedang menyerang Malaysia.
I BELIEVE THIS. I HAVE BEEN STUDYING THIS FOR AGES SINCE 1992. THE ONLY WAY TO SECURE ZIONISM EXISTENCE IS TO PARALYSE THE STRONGEST ISLAMIC COUNTRIES NAMELY SAUDI, EGYPT, LIBYA, IRAQ, SYRIA AND IRAN. ZIONISTS TOGETHER WITH THEIR DOG I.E. USA, MANAGED TO EITHET PARALYSE OR BECOME PUPPET MASTERS TO ALL THOSE.COUNTRIES EXCEPT IRAN. WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ARE ATTACKING IRAN NOW ON THE NUCKLEAR MATTER? NOW.... WHAT HAS ALL THIS GOT TO DO WITH MALAYSIA? THE NEXT STRONG ISLAMIC NATION AFTER THOSE COUNTRIES MENTIONED ABOVE IS INDONESIA, WHOM THEY HAVE INFILTRATED, NIGERIA, THAT IS NOW SCREWED UP, AND OF COURSE, MALAYSIA. THE JEWS CONTROL MEDIA AND THRU MEDIA THEY DESTROY COUNTRIES. CHARACTER ASSASSINATION IS JUST AS EFFECTIVE AS REAL ASSASSINATION.

Jawapan 8 : Adalah bodoh jika Najib Razak guna akaun sendiri untuk terima wang
I DON'T THINK PM SAID THIS AT ALL? HIS SUPPORTERS MUST HAVE SAID THIS. LOGICALLY IF THE MONEY PURELY FOR UMNO TO USE FOR ELECTION THEN YA... THIS DOES NOT SOUND RIGHT. IF THE MONEY IS FOR FIGHTING ISIS ETC AND PERSONALLY CAME FROM ROYALTIES OF SAUDI INSTEAD OF PROPER SAUDI GOVERNMENT, THEN OF COURSE THE MONEY CANNOT GO INTO GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT OR UMNO ACCOUNT.

Jawapan 9 : RM2.6 bilion itu tak wujud.
ERRR BECAUSE IT WAS RETURNED? OR MAYBE ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO TRY TO NOT DISCLOSE ABOUT ITS TRUE PURPOSE.

Jawapan 10 : RM2.6 bilion itu adalah Derma.
WELL OK. SINCE SAUDI ROYALTY HAS CONFIRMED IT.

Jawapan 11 : Penderma RM2.6 bilion itu adalah adalah dari Timur Tengah.
OK. IT IS FROM SAUDI. SO WHAT?

Jawapan 12 : Najib berhak untuk merahsiakan derma.
I WOULD. WHY? BECAUSE IT IS FROM SAUDI ROYALTY TO NAJB FOR THE SAKE OF PROTECTING ISLAM ETC. NOT A G TO G MATTER. IF NOT BECAUSE OF PERSONAL IN NATURE, BECAUSE OF THE NECESSARY SECRECY TO PROTECT THE NATION AS MENTIONED UP ABOVE.

Jawapan 13 : Pembangkang perlu isytihar Penderma.
WELL, DON'T WE ALL WANT POLITICIANS TO BE TRANSPARENT? BN HAS BEEN TRYING TO PUSH THIS THROUGH SINCE BEFORE THE RM2.6B DEBACLE.

Jawapan 14 : Tun Mahathir cemburu tak dapat duit derma sebanyak itu.
THIS IS JUST OUTE THRASH TALK. WHO SAID THIS? NEVERMIND I DO NOT WANT TO KNOW. I DO NOT THINK THAT ANY OFFICIAL STATEMENTS HAVE THIS. VERY IRRESPONSIBLE OF YOU TO PUT SUCH THRASH TALK IN THIS DISCUSSION.

Jawapan 15 : Duit itu guna untuk pilihanraya & kerja kebajikan
I DON'T NEED TO REPEAT ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION ALLOWANCE ON THIS. GO READ BACK MY COMMENTS ABOVE.

Jawapan 16 : Duit itu guna untuk melawan IS
YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THINGS. MALAYSIA IS AN ISLAMIC COUNTRY IN SUBSTANCE IF NOT IN ITS LEGALITY ALTHOUGH THE CONSTITUTION INCLINES TOWARDS ISLAM. MUSLIMS GLOBALLY CALL THEMSELVES UMMAH. THEY ARE BROTHERS REGARDLESS OF COUNTRIES. SO IF A FELLOW MUSLIM COUNTRY WANTS TO DONATE FOR THE SAKE OF THE BETTERMENT OF MUSLIM UMMAH, THE 70% POPULATION OF MALAYSIA MAY NOT HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THIS. MALAYSIAN MUSLIMS, I FEEL, DO NOT WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH ISIS. MONEY FROM SAUDI TO MALAYSIA TO HELP FIGHT TERRORISTS.... JUST LIKE MONEY FROM MALAYSIA TO HELP THE POOR PALESTINIANS AFTER BEING BOMB BY THE ISRAELIS. SO WHAT?

Jawapan 17 : Duit itu guna untuk melawan DAP YAHUDI
DAP GETS FUNDING FROM ZIONISTS ASSOCIATED SOURCES. I CANNOY CONFIRM THIS BUT ANYTHING AGAINTS YAHUDI, I HAVE NO ISSUES. SO WOULD ALL THE MUSLIMS IN MALAYSIA. AND OF COURSE EVEN IF NO YAHUDIS IN THE EQUATION, MONEY TO BATTLE DAP IS ELECTION DONATION. SO GO BACK TO EARLIER DISCUSSION.

Jawapan 18 : Duit itu bukan duit rakyat, jangan dengki dengan rezeki seseorang
TRUE WHAT. NOT RAKYAT'S MONEY. SAUDI'S MONEY.

Jawapan 19 : BERSIH juga menerima duit derma
I READ THAT YES THEY DO RECEIVE DONATIONS. SO?

Jawapan 20 : jangan ganggu pentadbiran Najib, zaman Tun sudah berlalu
TUN MAHATHIR IS DESTROYING THE NATION BY COMPOUNDING THE NEGATIVITY. NO CURRENT PM SHOULD BE THE PUPPET OF PREVIOUS PM. I SUPPORT THIS VIEW. DO NOT WANT A LEE KUAN YEE SHIT HAPPENING HERE.

Jawapan 21 : Saya sudah berjumpa dengan keluarga penderma
SO WHAT? IF THE MONEY IS FROM SAUDI, THEN NO PROBLEM IF ZAHID WENT TO SEE SAUDIS TO CONFIRM RIGHT? BUAT SALAH, TAK BUAT SALAH.

Jawapan 22 : Bank Negara tahu, saya tidak melakukan apa apa kesalahan
BNM KNOWS HUGE MONETARY TRANSACTIONS. TO SAY THEY DID NOT NO IS UTTER BULLSHIT EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT.

Jawapan 23 : ada plurals penderma, bukan seorang penderma
ERRRR MANY ROYALTIES FROM SAUDI? DUHHH... SO WHAT? KING... KING'S PRINCE... KING'S COUNSIN..... WHATEVER.

Jawapan 24 : Azalina uthman- ya kah?mungkin zahidi lebih tahu dari apa yang kami tak tahu
BECAUSE ZAHID WENT TO SEE THE SAUDIS? SO WHAT?

Jawapan 25 : Saya telah membelanjakan kesemua RM 2.6B untuk kegunaan umno
I DO NOT THINK THIS WAS SAID OFFICIALLY. YOU SURE. SHOW ME.

Jawapan 26 : Henti kan fitnah. Wang itu wang derma bukan rasuah. ( Issue fitnah kembali berkumandang)
WELL BASED ON ABOVR 26 POINTS WE CAN ASSUME OPPOSITIONS TRYING TO CAPITALISE IS AS POLITICAL MILEAGE.... THAT TRANSLATES TO FITNAH REALLY.

Jawapan 27 : Aishah RA juga di fitnah. Tapi sudi memafkan penfitnah. Aishah RA berjiwa besar.
WHO IS THIS AGAIN? NOT BOTHERED ABOUT ANY AISHAH. WHO CARES ABOUT BLOODY AISHAH. NOT RELEVANT FOR THE COUNTRY.

Jawapan 28 : SPRM jumpa penderma tunggal, bukan lebih dari seorang.
WELL AGAIN... KING... PRINCE... KING'S COUNSIN... SO WHAT?

Jawapan 29 : RM 2.03B telah di pulangkan kembali kepada keluarga diraja arab
YA OK. NOTHING WRONG RIGHT? SINCE THE MONEY HAS CAUSED TOO MUCH CONTROVERSY WHY NOT JUST RETURN IT. BUANG SUWEIIIII. SOME MAY HAVE BEEN USED FOR ITS PURPOSE.... ELECTIONS OF BATTLING TERRORISTS.... WHATEVER.

Jawapan 30 : Tiada kesalahan jenayah di lakukan oleh PM. Minta SPRM mengugurkan kertas siasatan dan kes di tutup kerana tiada fakta jelas dan tiada bukti
MY UNDERATANDING IS THIS.... BEFORE ANY SYSTEM CAN PROSECUTE ANYONE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NEEDS TO HAVE PROPER AND ADEQUATE EVIDENCE. IF NOT PROSECUTED THEN THE COURTS OF LAW IS IRRELEVANT. BASED ON THIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL SHOULD SHARE ITS CONCLUSION WITH MACC. IF ATTORNEY GENERAL IS NOT PROSECUTING, THEN WHY SHOULD MACC PROCEED. UNLESS MACC HAS MORE EVIDENCE THEN MACC NEEDS TO PRESENT IT. I THINK MACC HAS PRESENTED ALL INFO TO WHOEVER THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO. EVEN IF MACC SAYS ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVE NO RIGHT TO STOP MACC FROM FURTHER INVESTIGATING, ATTORNEY GENERAL STILL HAS THE OBLIGATION TO TELL THEM WHAT HE THINKS IS FAIR. MACC CAN CONTINUE BY ALL MEANS.


~~~~~

 


* kopihangtuah



| mcmlxxv:viii:xxix |

0 comments:

Post a Comment