Part 2: The Question about Malaysia Under the Rule of the Malays

www.kopihangtuah.blogspot.com

 

Cohesion, if it is to happen, is a multi-faceted process: It can be broken down into four main components: social relations, task relations, perceived unity and emotions. We (Malaysians) scored low on all accounts given the disparity in the composition of ethnic group contribution from the perspectives of economy, administration, education and politics.

  

Y MALAYSIAN Chinese and Indian colleagues continue to have debates with me on the Question about Malaysia under the rule of the Malays. This debate is never meant to accuse each other of any wrong doings but rather, to uncover the rationale of this complex society that we are living in, and to explore possibilities of alternative solutions to the underlying critical ethnic based disparity or non-cohesiveness. A state of cohesion can only happen when its members possess bonds linking them to one another and to the group as a whole. Obviously, the bond between ethnic groups (in Malaysia) is far from happening given the continuing turmoil of ethnic relations. This is a result of political warfare that uses ethnic (and religion) sentiments as their propaganda.

Cohesion, if it is to happen, is a multi-faceted process: It can be broken down into four main components: social relations, task relations, perceived unity and emotions. We (Malaysians) scored low on all accounts given the disparity in the composition of ethnic group contribution from the perspectives of economy, administration, education and politics. Members of strongly cohesive groups are more inclined to participate readily and to stay with the group. For a start, a healthy discussion and debate can be a catalyst for change, which is what transpired between me and my mates (non-Malays). I should share some of our conversations (as below):


EMAIL FROM A FRIEND

On Bumi policies, here is my thought:  In order for a 1 year old boy to walk, the mother needs to let go.  Malaysia is a mother that since 1963 has allowed one child to walk without help, while holding another child close to its bosom. The reason was that one child started out with seemingly greater advantages. After nearly 60 years of this, the child held close to the bottom has atrophied legs and has never learned how to fend for itself, and it cannot compete with the other kid, let alone the other kids in the village.  The kid held by the mother keeps saying that this is its right, because it was the first to be born, and that may be true, but an attitude like this will never change its position among the other children.

Meanwhile the child left to fend for itself has to compete among the other children in the village and by learning to fall, and learning to walk by itself, it has grown independent. Other families would happily accept this child as its own. And the child wonders if it is better off living in another home, with another family, where it is treated just like the other kids. But this child is always looking into the window of the home where it was born and the sees the mother holding the first born, and wonders why it is not loved. Meanwhile the child held by the mother keeps saying - next year I will learn to walk by myself. But not now. Now it is still too hard. Next year. Let's see. I bet in 2020, nothing will have changed.

MY EMAIL REPLY

You want change? What I am saying is that you won't be able to get that change (at least in our life time) if Political Will and Economic Disparity are not addressed. The former is about the majority rules national policy. You cannot not respect the position that the majority has. Therefore you cannot say that policies are not suitable when the majority believes otherwise. If you want the majority to follow you, you must first convince the majority that what had caused them to device the policy in the first place can be addressed by alternative means. Which brings me to the latter point, Economic Disparity. What makes it more difficult is that the ratio of Malays to non-Malays is rising favouring the Malays. Malays have more children than non-Malays. And the impact of non-Malays leaving the country compounds it. My prediction is that no change will happen favouring the non-Malays in the near future.

I do want to strongly highlight that Government had abolished the 30% Bumi equity quota back in 2011, which you (and many other non-Malays) have conveniently forgot to give credit - is that not a big sacrifice worthy of being called a change? Nobody, I really mean it, nobody, praised the Government on this change. Not the non-Malays and certainly not the Malays. In fact the Government lost Malay votes but neither did they gain non-Malay votes as evident in the Chinese Tsunami in the 2013 General Electrions. However, that change was done anyway - forget about the votes because that shouldn't matter if you are talking about equality or equitability. You bark on things that are lacking but you silent when things that are given? Take that frustration and amplify by the population of non-Malays. If I was the Prime Minister, I would surely be mega frustrated and it demotivates me to help non-Malays. Even with that (frustration), millions of Ringgit had been allocated for Chinese and Indian schools. I am not trying to tell you the frustration. I am trying to tell you how the dynamics of things aren't going to be conducive for any change to happen in the near future.

What are Malay benefits? Let's analyse as follows: 

1. Policy on equity - This has been abolished.

2. Scholarship - The Government has started giving to non-Malays long time ago. I have personally signed professional membership forms for many Chinese that worked for me that were Petronas scholars.

3. Malay reserve land - This was the sole biggest condition after acknowledgement of the monarchy existence for the Sultans to allow their states to join Malaysia. If not, they would not have joined. To dishonor this means they can leave the country because it is in the constitution. Tunku asked the Malay monarchy states to join Malaysia. If suddenly now we want to take that condition away, surely the Sultans will take their states to be independent of Malaysia because that is like forcing republican onto monarchy.

4. Work in the civil service - You can see many non-Malays in the Government service as well as Government-linked Companies (GLCs). The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Finance are Indians. The head of Securities Commission is a Punjabi. The Chief Executive Officer of the 1MDB is an Indian. The Chief Executive Officer of Malaysian entrepreneur centre, MaGIC, is a Chinese. Many of the senior posts in the Ministry of Finance are occupied by Chinese. The second in command in the Economic Planning Unit is a Punjabi. The Chief Operating Officer of Multimedia Development Corporation (MDeC) is a Chinese. I rest my case.

5. Procurement of Government projects - Many are given to GLCs but many GLCs have non-Malays in their high ranks. Private companies that get Government projects have both Malays and non-Malays like IJM, YTL, and many more. Not to mention that the entire ecosystem of every industry is controlled by Chinese from A to Z since time in memorial.

6. Grants and Subsidies - True that many grants are given to the Bumi. Perhaps because many farmers are Bumi? But if it is not agriculture base, you can see many non-Malaysa get the benefit of grants. I cannot comment on other industries that I have not worked in but I can say my observations on creative industry. MyCreative give loans to both Malays and no-Malays. Filem Nasional (Finas), MDeC and Malaysia Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) give grants to almost 50:50 split between Malays and non-Malays. They even have Chinese and Indians on their deciding Committees. Cradle gives out grants to entrepreneurs and the last I checked, huge portion went to Chinese.

7. Parliamentary seats - Well, naturally that will follow the population composition? Cannot be any fairer than that.

If you are to do a statistical research, I will not be surprised if non-Malay's opportunities can reach or surpass the % of their contribution to the population, say 30%. So as you can see, with the above, the Malays are already realising that their benefits have been diluted over the years. No wonder they (Malays) get jittery when they are being attacked on both racial and religious fronts. All I am asking you to understand is the psychology of things. Change can happen but not now, or else, it will be instant recipe for disaster for both sides.

  

Malays are already realising that their benefits have been diluted over the years. No wonder they (Malays) get jittery when they are being attacked on both racial and religious fronts. All I am asking you to understand is the psychology of things. Change can happen but not now, or else, it will be instant recipe for disaster for both sides

* kopihangtuah

| mcmlxxv:viii:xxix |

Part 1: The Question about Malaysia Under the Rule of the Malays

www.kopihangtuah.blogspot.com

Naturally, they (Malays) will use that 70% power (majority population), which is the only power that they have, to balance the 80% economic power that non-Malays have. In the end, it is the game of equation in the name of equitability, but at the expense of equality..... if this makes sense at all.

ALAYSIAN Chinese and Indian colleagues who are living overseas have lost their hopes in Malaysia. They had migrated to other countries on the basis of the 2nd class treatment they claim they had faced in Malaysia. What does this "2nd Class Treatment" really means? Many of them are 3rd generation Chinese and Indians and they are as Malaysian as any Malays who are also of the same age group. The underlying current that drives the river is very much a sensitive and taboo aspect of the Malaysian multicultural society - The Question about Malaysia under the rule of the Malays.

It is very difficult to unfold the rationale and logics of this matter. However, it is possible to identify the various elements that had led to this situation as well as the continued status of the situation. This opportunity (identification of elements) was presented to me when my Chinese colleague, who has migrated to London, recently emailed me with 5 questions surrounding this topic -  The Question about Malaysia under the rule of the Malays. It took me quite awhile to answer but I managed to give some of my thoughts as extracted below:

QUESTION 1: So do you think Malaysia will become a developed nation by 2020?  

ANSWER 1: My hopes are high. Despite the economic turnoil, Malaysia closed 2014 with at least 5% GDP growth, 3% fiscal deficit and record foreign investments of whatever the figure is that was reported just yesterday. Ringgit at USD3.5 is good to boost exports. To achieve 2020 target we need more development expenditure. As we speak, the Government is devicing the 11th Malaysia Plan 2016 - 2020. Hopefully there will be enough development expenditure to have a quantum leap. Although 2015 has or will be dampened as Malaysia spends a lot to recover from the great 2014 floods that destroyed half of the Peninsula. 

QUESTION 2: How is the Malaysian economic position now under the rule of Barisan Nasional (BN)? 

ANSWER 2: Continuing from the above, Malaysia has the strongest economy after Singapore for ASEAN despite the popular believe that Vietnam was supposed to shine as the emerging market. At the moment a good chunk of the economy is sick because of the oil price impact to Petronas but on a net basis, Malaysia is a net importer of oil. So low oil price should not have too much impact. Lower dividends from Petronas to the Government will however dampen the Government's coffers for development expenditure. But hey, that is a world phenomenon, not Malaysian centric.  

QUESTION 3: So is Malaysia still going to be ruled by a puppet coalition democracy? 

ANSWER 3: Even if the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) wins, it will be another puppet coalition. If fact, not only puppet, it would be disastrous trying to harmonise Islamic PAS with Secular DAP. DAP cannot win on its own but PAS can win a lot of seats on its own merely because of its mass Malay and Islamic appeal as represented by the majority of the population. If PR wins, it will be a weak coalition because its component parties lack congruent ideologies. When the Government (assuming under PR) is weak, everything will collapse even worse that if a collapse is to happen under BN. On absolute measure, both sides are evil. On relativity preference, I'd go for those with track record that had managed the country through the heydays of 1980's and 1990's average 8% p.a. growth. You must understand that 70% of the population is Malay and Islam. They will either support UMNO, PAS or PKR. It is in the best interest of the non-Malays to not be imposed with Islamic laws. So non-Malays wouldn't want to support PAS. PAS is stronger than PKR who has now lost its will because its President is in jail. DAP and PAS will never get along. In short, they will always be an opposition front, like it or not. 

QUESTION 4: How long will you people (Malays) need the Bumi policies? If it does not work, don't you need to change strategy?  

ANSWER 4: The policies are set based on majority parliamentary proceedings. Generally UMNO + PAS + PKR will vote for it. Non-Malays are never going to be able to get rid of it. Unless, of course, if Malaysia takes IMF package and IMF imposes prohibition of affirmative actions. Bumi policies are affirmative actions. It is never an equality principle but instead an equitable principle. Very much like a 7 yr old that is left to walk by himself but a 1 yr old is carried by Mommy. The question is, when is the 1 yr old going to reach 7 years old? The answer is when 70% of the population owns 70% of the country's wealth. Various methods have been used in the past. They may have not worked. Hence Prime Minister Najib had abolished the 30% bumi equity rule - which is a really big sacrifice that many non-Malays fail to give credit. Now he (Najib) is getting Malay professionals to buy and manage assets under Malay management under Ekuinas. You asked about change in methods. This is a change.

QUESTION 5: So non-Malays will remain to be "tolerated visitors" forever?  

ANSWER 5: Many non-Malays question why they are treated like 2nd class citizens when they are 3rd generation Malaysians. This is the consequences of what had been agreed between Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tun Tan Cheng Lock and Tun Sambanthan in 1957. In order for the Chinese and Indians to remain in the Malay Peninsula as citizens, they had to agree to the Malay privilege. Had Mr Tan and Mr Sambanthan disagree, they would have had to bring their people back to mainland China and India. Now, is that fair? Well, fair to the 1st generation but not fair to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th generations. For the younger generations, if they are to amend such social contract, they need to address 2 big ticket items. No. 1: Whether they have the political inertia to change the constitution. With 70% of the population being Bumi, non-Malays do not have the inertia. How would they then persuade that 70% to feel for them and get the political inertia? Well, that brings us to No. 2:  Economic disparity. As long as the Malays are not economically on par (with the non-Malays), they will always be disadvantaged and the feeling of being slaves in their own country will re-emerge like how they felt during 1800's when the economy was architecturally biased towards Chinese as designed by the British (whether intentionally or not). So without No. 2, which is equitable, you cannot get No. 1. Without No. 1, there will never be equality. Is it fair? Well, many ethnic groups in the past have lost their local economic significance and, later, their sovereignty to foreigners who become citizens. Examples are Fijians to the Indians; Aboriginals to the Caucasians in Australia and New Zealand; Blacks to Caucasians in South Africa; Singaporean Malays to Singaporean Chinese; Red Indians to Caucasian Americans; Palestinians to Zionists; and many more. In those cases it is not fair to the those people. So, in Malaysia, the Malays will do everything in their power to not allow that. There are indicators read by the Malays that had led the Malays to believe that once lost (their sovereignty) to the Chinese, they will never recover. This is not helping. What are the indicators? Chinese control over prices of supplies as they control majority supply chains in almost everything except petroleum. Every time Malays try to enter (the supply chain), the Chinese will cut prices to the point where the Malays go bankrupt. They (Chinese) have the stamina to create barriers to entry. The Chinese also monopolises some imports that the exclusivity that they posses gives them that power. Not only imports, even the local produce such as rice, cattle, vegetables and fish (except for Syed Mokhtar related businesses). The Malay fishermen, farmers, etc, have no choice other than to follow because their livelihood is controlled by the Chinese wholesalers. It is racist to stamp wholesalers and supply agents as "Chinese" but that is the reality. If reality is not addressed and hidden under taboo, then how else are you going to address this Malay Dilemma? The Malays who roamed this land for hundreds of years with 9 Sultans but own nothing of this land (hypothetically) is a recipe for inter-racial war. The only solution is to address economic disparity. Religious intolerance that we see today is just a consequence of that. As long as this (disparity) is pervasive, the Bumi policies will remain. It is an equation. The left will equal the right. If you reduce one side, the other side will reduce. They saw how Malays in Singapore lost their island to Chinese. They are seeing how Chinese in Penang continuously making the island like China rather than Malaysia (increase in open non-halal food stalls and mainland China activities imported for festivals, etc). They see how Chinese are unwilling to let go of Chinese schools for Kebangsaan schools - refusal to assimilate. When they see or saw all of this, naturally they will use that 70% power, which is the only power that they have, to balance the 80% economic power that non-Malays have. In the end, it is the game of equation in the name of equitability, but at the expense of equality..... if this makes sense at all. 

* kopihangtuah

| mcmlxxv:viii:xxix |